{"id":2337,"date":"2025-03-11T07:03:02","date_gmt":"2025-03-11T07:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/11\/2503-06079\/"},"modified":"2025-03-11T07:03:02","modified_gmt":"2025-03-11T07:03:02","slug":"2503-06079","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/11\/2503-06079\/","title":{"rendered":"Fixing the Pitfalls of Probabilistic Time-Series Forecasting Evaluation by Kernel Quadrature"},"content":{"rendered":"

Fixing the Pitfalls of Probabilistic Time-Series Forecasting Evaluation by Kernel Quadrature
\n \t

\n
<\/BR>
\n
\n \t

\n
<\/BR><\/p>\n

arXiv:2503.06079v1 Announce Type: new
\nAbstract: Despite the significance of probabilistic time-series forecasting models, their evaluation metrics often involve intractable integrations. The most widely used metric, the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS), is a strictly proper scoring function; however, its computation requires approximation. We found that popular CRPS estimators–specifically, the quantile-based estimator implemented in the widely used GluonTS library and the probability-weighted moment approximation–both exhibit inherent estimation biases. These biases lead to crude approximations, resulting in improper rankings of forecasting model performance when CRPS values are close. To address this issue, we introduced a kernel quadrature approach that leverages an unbiased CRPS estimator and employs cubature construction for scalable computation. Empirically, our approach consistently outperforms the two widely used CRPS estimators.<\/div>\n

\t

\n
<\/BR>
\n Masaki Adachi, Masahiro Fujisawa, Michael A Osborne
\n \t

\n
<\/BR>
\nGo to original source<\/a>
\n \t

\n
<\/BR><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fixing the Pitfalls of Probabilistic Time-Series Forecasting Evaluation by Kernel Quadrature arXiv:2503.06079v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite the significance of probabilistic time-series forecasting models, their evaluation metrics often involve intractable integrations. The most widely used metric, the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS), is a strictly proper scoring function; however, its computation requires approximation. We found […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,113,112],"tags":[1991,355,1992],"class_list":["post-2337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aimldsaimlds","category-cs-lg","category-stat-ml","tag-crps","tag-forecasting","tag-probabilistic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2337"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2337"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2337\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}