AI isn’t taking your job. Executives are.
\n \t
\n
<\/BR>
\n
\n \t
\n
<\/BR><\/p>\n
If AI is ready to replace developers, why aren’t developers replacing themselves with AI and just taking it easy at work?<\/p>\n
I’m a Director at my company. I’m in the meetings and helping set up the tools that cost people their jobs. Here’s how they work:<\/p>\n
Claude AI writes some code<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
The code gets passed to a developer for validation<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Since the developer’s “just validating”, he can be replaced with an overseas contractor that’ll work for a fraction of the pay<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
We’ve tracked the tools, and we haven’t seen any evidence that having Claude take a crack at the code saves anybody any time – but it does let us justify replacing expensive employees with cheap overseas contractors.<\/p>\n
You’re not getting replaced by AI.<\/p>\n
Your job’s being outsourced overseas.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
submitted by \/u\/takenorinvalid <\/a>
[link]<\/a><\/span> [comments]<\/a><\/span>\n<\/div>\n