{"id":6382,"date":"2025-08-27T07:02:32","date_gmt":"2025-08-27T07:02:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/2025\/08\/27\/2508-18901\/"},"modified":"2025-08-27T07:02:32","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T07:02:32","slug":"2508-18901","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/2025\/08\/27\/2508-18901\/","title":{"rendered":"Sparse minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance for feature selection"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sparse minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance for feature selection
\n \t

\n
<\/BR>
\n
\n \t

\n
<\/BR><\/p>\n

arXiv:2508.18901v1 Announce Type: new
\nAbstract: We propose a feature screening method that integrates both feature-feature and feature-target relationships. Inactive features are identified via a penalized minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) procedure, which is the continuous version of the classic mRMR penalized by a non-convex regularizer, and where the parameters estimated as zero coefficients represent the set of inactive features. We establish the conditions under which zero coefficients are correctly identified to guarantee accurate recovery of inactive features. We introduce a multi-stage procedure based on the knockoff filter enabling the penalized mRMR to discard inactive features while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). Our method performs comparably to HSIC-LASSO but is more conservative in the number of selected features. It only requires setting an FDR threshold, rather than specifying the number of features to retain. The effectiveness of the method is illustrated through simulations and real-world datasets. The code to reproduce this work is available on the following GitHub: https:\/\/github.com\/PeterJackNaylor\/SmRMR.<\/div>\n

\t

\n
<\/BR>
\n Peter Naylor, Benjamin Poignard, H’ector Climente-Gonz’alez, Makoto Yamada
\n \t

\n
<\/BR>
\nGo to original source<\/a>
\n \t

\n
<\/BR><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sparse minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance for feature selection arXiv:2508.18901v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose a feature screening method that integrates both feature-feature and feature-target relationships. Inactive features are identified via a penalized minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) procedure, which is the continuous version of the classic mRMR penalized by a non-convex regularizer, and where […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,113,183,112],"tags":[321,117,3611],"class_list":["post-6382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aimldsaimlds","category-cs-lg","category-stat-me","category-stat-ml","tag-feature","tag-features","tag-inactive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6382"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}