{"id":8141,"date":"2025-11-05T23:02:25","date_gmt":"2025-11-05T23:02:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/2025\/11\/05\/nih-indirect-costs-lawsuit-argued-federal-appeals-court\/"},"modified":"2025-11-05T23:02:25","modified_gmt":"2025-11-05T23:02:25","slug":"nih-indirect-costs-lawsuit-argued-federal-appeals-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/2025\/11\/05\/nih-indirect-costs-lawsuit-argued-federal-appeals-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeals court judges seem skeptical of Trump administration\u2019s defense of capping NIH overhead payments"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>    Appeals court judges seem skeptical of Trump administration\u2019s defense of capping NIH overhead payments<br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n    <!-- no image --><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Federal appeals court judges\u2019 questions and comments during a hearing Wednesday suggested they may be skeptical of some of the Trump administration\u2019s central arguments in a lawsuit challenging its proposed changes to research overhead payments.<\/p>\n<p>The case revolves around a multibillion dollar question: Did the National Institutes of Health, the nation\u2019s premier funder of biomedical research, violate federal law in an announced plan to slash support for research overhead?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/2025\/11\/05\/nih-indirect-costs-lawsuit-argued-federal-appeals-court\/?utm_campaign=rss\">Read the rest\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><br \/>\n    Jonathan Wosen<br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n<BR><\/BR><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/2025\/11\/05\/nih-indirect-costs-lawsuit-argued-federal-appeals-court\/?utm_campaign=rss\">Go to statnews<\/a><br \/>\n \t<BR><br \/>\n <BR><\/BR><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appeals court judges seem skeptical of Trump administration\u2019s defense of capping NIH overhead payments Federal appeals court judges\u2019 questions and comments during a hearing Wednesday suggested they may be skeptical of some of the Trump administration\u2019s central arguments in a lawsuit challenging its proposed changes to research overhead payments. The case revolves around a multibillion [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[153,2148,2144,858],"tags":[2150],"class_list":["post-8141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal","category-nih","category-politics","category-research","tag-statnews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8141"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8141\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mailitics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}